| Similar Articles |
|---|
 |
U.S. CPSC
May 25, 2006 |
"Baby 2 Pack" Pacifiers Recalled for Choking Hazard The pacifier's nipple can easily detach from the guard, posing a serious choking hazard to young children.   |
U.S. CPSC
March 24, 2009 |
Pacifiers Recalled by OKK Trading Due to Choking Hazard The pacifiers are banned under federal law. They failed federal safety tests when the nipples separated from the base. This poses a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
November 18, 2009 |
Grand World Recalls "Bobby Chupete" Pacifiers Due to Choking Hazard The pacifiers fail to meet federal safety standards. The pacifier mouth guard is too small, posing a choking hazard to infants and toddlers. |
U.S. CPSC
April 5, 2011 |
Pampers Natural Stages Pacifiers Recalled by Key Baby Due to Choking Hazard The pacifiers fail to meet federal safety standards and pose a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
March 4, 2005 |
The Elegant Kids 2000 Inc. Recall of Pacifiers The pacifiers are banned under federal law. They failed federal safety tests when the nipples separated from the base and can pose a choking hazard to infants and small children. |
U.S. CPSC
April 7, 2009 |
Pacifiers Recalled by Healthtex Due to Choking Hazard The pacifiers failed to meet federal safety standards. The nipples can separate from the base easily, posing a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
January 13, 2009 |
Top Goods Trading Recalls Flashing Pacifiers Due to Choking and Strangulation Hazard The flashing pacifiers do not comply with federal safety standards for pacifiers. Although the pacifiers are marketed to older children and adults, they could be given to babies and cause serious injury or death. |
U.S. CPSC
July 7, 2009 |
Pacifiers Recalled by Gromex Due to Choking Hazard The pacifier mouth guard and the ventilation holes are too small and fail to meet federal safety standards. The pacifier could pose a choking and aspiration hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
November 2, 2006 |
Various Firms Recall Flashing Pacifiers for Choking, Aspiration and Strangulation Hazards The nipple can separate from the shield easily, posing a choking hazard. Some pacifiers were sold with necklaces that pose a strangulation hazard, and one of the necklaces has beads that can come loose, which poses an aspiration hazard. |
U.S. CPSC
September 17, 2003 |
"Comforts" Pacifiers Recalled by Apothecary Products Inc. These pacifiers fail federal safety tests, come apart, and can pose a choking hazard to infants and small children. |
U.S. CPSC
December 1, 2005 |
Ideal Distributors Inc. Recall of Pacifiers The nipples can detach from the base, posing a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
September 24, 2004 |
Natura Products Downey Inc. Recall of Pacifiers The pacifiers are banned under federal law. They failed federal safety tests, come apart, and can pose a choking hazard to infants and small children. |
U.S. CPSC
November 21, 2007 |
Flashing Pacifiers Recalled By Sailing (U.S.) International Corp. Due to Choking Hazard The nipple can detach from the base, posing a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
October 26, 2009 |
CPSC Urges Parents and Caregivers to Stop Using "My Baby Soother" Pacifiers Due to Choking Hazard The pacifiers failed to meet federal safety standards because the nipples can separate from the base easily, posing a choking hazard to infants and toddlers. |
U.S. CPSC
July 20, 2010 |
Pacifiers Recalled by Antonio Flores Due to Choking Hazard The pacifier fails to meet federal safety standards. The nipple can separate from the base easily, the pacifier handle is too long, the mouth guard is too small and there are no ventilation holes on the mouth guard. The pacifier could pose a choking and aspiration hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
January 10, 2008 |
Shims Bargain Recalls Pacifiers Due to Choking Hazard The pacifier shield is too small and could easily enter the mouth of an infant. Also, ventilation holes are too small and not placed to allow for the insertion of a tool to remove the pacifier when lodged in the mouth of a child. Finally, the package fails to display a required warning. |
U.S. CPSC
February 9, 2005 |
Todo Dollar Wholesale Recall of Pacifiers The nipple can detach from the pacifier, posing a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
April 7, 2005 |
Solar Inc. Recall of Flashing Toy Pacifiers The nipple can detach from the base, posing a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
April 20, 2005 |
California International Trading Recall of Pacifiers and Two Electronic Toys The pacifiers and toys can easily break apart, exposing small parts. This poses a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
May 12, 2005 |
Delta Enterprise Corp. Recall of Lov's Pacifiers The pacifiers are banned under federal law. They failed federal safety tests when the nipples separated from the base. This poses a choking hazard to young children. |
U.S. CPSC
July 22, 2008 |
It's MY Binky Recalls Personalized Pacifiers Due to Choking Hazard The pacifier button, ring handle and shield with nipple can detach, posing a choking hazard to infants. |
Entrepreneur
June 2007
Sara Wilson |
All That Glitters Transforming promotional tees from drab to fab is this company's specialty. |
Bank Technology News
June 2010
Daniel Wolfe |
Bling Nation Wants To Scale Up Bling Nation Ltd. wants to see how well its hands-on approach to deploying mobile payment systems can scale, with a new partnership that gives it access to over 330 potential bank clients. |
U.S. Banker
July 2010 |
Tap, Pay and Go Some community bankers are raving about Bling Nation's mobile payment service. Now they just have to convince customers and local merchants to use it. |
