| Similar Articles |
|---|
 |
Reason
July 2005 |
Who Should Reign Supreme? Libertarian legal experts weigh in on who their favorites are--past, present, and future--on the nation's highest court.   |
Reason
October 2004
Damon W. Root |
Bad Deal Two books chronicle how FDR made life worse for African Americans: Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown... FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression... |
BusinessWeek
February 10, 2011
Paul M. Barrett |
Attack of the Commerce Clause A new assault on regulation is gathering force -- and it's deploying a constitutional weapon |
American History
December 14, 2004
David J. Garrow |
The Once and Future Supreme Court The last four decades have witnessed a fundamental transformation in the types of men, and now women, who exercise the broad and untrammeled judicial power of the U.S. Supreme Court. |
Salon.com
July 4, 2001
Gary Kamiya |
Against the law Two new books make it clear that the Supreme Court's notorious Bush vs. Gore ruling wasn't as bad as it seemed at the time. It was worse... |
BusinessWeek
November 22, 2004
Lorraine Woellert |
What The New Court Will Look Like Bush's model is Antonin Scalia. But nominees who share the justice's strict "textualist" approach could set off a firestorm of opposition |
Reason
October 2005
Cathy Young |
Antonin Scalia, Judicial Activist How the conservative justice legislates from the bench. |
BusinessWeek
September 27, 2004
France & Woellert |
The Battle Over The Courts Politics, ideology and special interests are compromising the U.S. justice system. And all the crossfire is driving away potential non-partisan judges. |
Reason
December 2008
Brian Doherty |
How the Second Amendment Was Restored The inside story of how a gang of libertarian lawyers made constitutional history, declaring by a 5-4 decision that yes, the Second Amendment does secure an individual right to keep and bear arms. |
Reason
May 2006
Damon W. Root |
When Bigots Become Reformers Book Review: The Progressive Era and Race: Reform and Reaction, 1900-1917, by David W. Southern deserves careful attention. The Progressive movement unleashed, aided, and abetted some of the most destructive forces in America. |
BusinessWeek
August 8, 2005
Lorraine Woellert |
States vs. The Feds: All Eyes On Roberts The fractious debate over federalism will be center stage at Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts confirmation hearings. |
Reason
July 2005 |
Not So Supreme A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law author Mark Tushnet explains William Rehnquist's legal legacy--and why the nation's top court matters less than you think. |
Reason
December 2001 |
Guarding the Home Front Will civil liberties be a casualty in the War on Terrorism? A panel of experts discuss which civil liberties they think are most at risk in what has been called America's first 21st century war... |
ifeminists
May 5, 2009
Charles Curley |
E.R.A. A Red Herring at Best In cleaning out my files, I discovered an excellent article on the Equal Rights Amendment that a much-valued friend had sent to me for consideration...in 1981. Oops!? |
ifeminists
February 18, 2003
Nicki Fellenzer |
Is It So Hard To Believe? Privacy, the first amendment, and legislation after 9/11. |
Reason
January 2005
Harvey Silverglate |
Civil Liberties and Enemy Combatants Why the Supreme Court's widely praised rulings are bad for America. |
ifeminists
March 10, 2004
Todd Andrew Barnett |
To Marry or Not to Marry Should the constitution be amended to protect the country from same sex marriages? |
IDB America
August 2003
Paul Constance |
Verdict pending After a decade of reforms, Latin America's courts are constantly in the news. But are they changing for the better? |
Reason
March 2001
Richard A. Epstein |
George Bush won. But at what cost to the law? Constitutional litigation will return to normal, but the political battles are just getting started... |
Salon.com
December 13, 2000 |
Split over the decision Two law professors offer two views of the Supreme Court ruling. Rotunda: The Florida court was acting like a psychic hot line; Raskin: The Supreme Court has disgraced itself... |
BusinessWeek
April 25, 2005
Lorraine Woellert |
Inside Bush's Supreme Team With a Supreme Court vacancy looming this year, true-blue liberals, rabid-red conservatives, and activists of every stripe are amassing millions of dollars and mobilizing thousands of true believers for a war expected to eclipse every other legislative issue on the congressional agenda. |
BusinessWeek
December 29, 2010
Peter Coy |
Commentary: The Health-Care Act on Trial The health-care insurance mandate isn't a ploy to expand Congress' power. It's a way to address unique problems. |
Salon.com
November 29, 2000
Bruce Shapiro |
Why the Supreme Court case matters The Florida election may be determined in state court, but a ruling in Bush's favor could further the high court's cannibalistic long-term assault on judicial power... |
BusinessWeek
September 27, 2004 |
Punch, Counterpunch The roots of contemporary strife over the federal judiciary date back nearly five decades, starting with Chief Justice Earl Warren. |
Inc.
June 2005
Allen P. Roberts Jr. |
Why Businesses Should Have Judge Dread Shouldn't a judicial nominee's thoughts on business law be scrutinized? |
Reason
August 2003
Bailey et al. |
Forcing Freedom Can liberalism be spread at gunpoint? |
U.S. Banker
September 2001
Roger Furman |
The Court Got It Wrong! Banks often feel that they receive a bum rap from courts. Some just lie there and take it, while others lobby for legislation that would undo the damage. Some do it right, and others do it wrong... |
ifeminists
July 27, 2005
Carey Roberts |
The Leftist-Feminist Brief Against Nominee Roberts Years ago the feminist Left came to realize that they would never achieve their socialistic goals if they had to rely on normal democratic processes. So their solution was to impose an abortion litmus test on the nominations process, seize control of the judiciary, and short-circuit the notion of government of the people, by the people, and for the people. |
Information Today
October 6, 2015
George H. Pike |
The Legal Implications of Banned Books Week The American Library Association's annual Banned Books Week celebrates the freedom to read by drawing attention to attempts to censor reading materials in public, school, and academic libraries. |
Pharmaceutical Executive
August 1, 2011
Jill Wechsler |
The Supremes Shape Pharma A number of important decisions from the Supreme Court will affect drug marketing, research, and regulation |
ifeminists
September 1, 2009
Carey Roberts |
How to Argue with a (Guilty) Liberal Esteemed reader, you are about to learn the truth of the long-standing love affair between American progressivism and European fascism. |
Sports Illustrated
June 5, 2001 |
World's Deepest Bench The Supreme Court's decision last week in PGA Tour v. Martin, in which the high court ruled that the Tour must allow Casey Martin the use of a golf cart during tournaments, was merely the latest foray by the Washington Nine into the world of athletics... |
BusinessWeek
June 20, 2005
Lorraine Woellert |
The Left's Supreme Effort A coalition of liberal groups is gearing to form a united front in the looming fight to keep hard-line conservatives off the high court. |
ifeminists
June 8, 2005
Wendy McElroy |
Privacy: Throwing Babies Out with Bath Water Privacy rights are under attack and cases are so legally tangled that analysis becomes blurred and bad law based on judicial activism becomes more possible. |
IDB America
May 2004 |
The Judge Who Came Down From His Pedestal The president of Costa Rica's Supreme Court says judges are public servants, and should be evaluated as such. |
Salon.com
June 27, 2001
Alicia Montgomery |
To Bork or not to Bork Democrats give notice that ideology will play a role when the Senate considers Bush's judicial nominees... |
Reason
March 2007
Cathy Young |
Enforcing Virtue If libertarians are seen as championing not simply freedom of choice but a rigidly nonjudgmental attitude toward all choices, then many people who might be sympathetic to liberty will be pushed into the arms of the authoritarians. |
BusinessWeek
May 12, 2011
Tim Jones |
Secret Cash Dominates in State Court Races Unidentified contributors are pumping big money into key races. |
ifeminists
April 30, 2007
Stephen Baskerville |
Duke Case Demonstrates Feminist "Justice" Decades of pursuing illusory, subjective, and politically defined "justice" have left Americans so incapable of distinguishing guilt from innocence that we are now inured to the most open injustice. |
Information Today
August 23, 2010
Carol Ebbinghouse |
Law.Gov Issues Principles and Declaration The founder of Law.Gov, Carl Malamud believes everyone should be able to find the laws that affect them. |
ifeminists
July 29, 2003
Wendy McElroy |
University Students Deserve Human Rights This September, make sure the students you care for pack protection of their civil liberties in with clothing and reference books. This is essential for students who are male, white, conservative, openly Christian, or from affluent families. |
IDB America
March 2003
Paul Constance |
Would you trust this court? Reformers strengthen judicial independence and fight to improve the credibility of judges in Latin America |
Reason
December 2001
Cathy Young |
Liberty's Paradoxes Must we surrender freedoms in order to remain free? |
Reason
June 2007 |
Letters Enforcing Virtue... Economically Conservative But Socially Liberal... |
BusinessWeek
February 7, 2005
Lorraine Woellert |
A Phony Cure Congress appears to be on the verge of passing legislation that would shift most big class actions out of state court. Is this really reform? Don't believe it. |
ifeminists
November 25, 2003
Thor L. Halvorssen |
Religious Liberty in Peril on Campus, National Surveys Reveal; Administrators, Students Ignorant of the Most Fundamental Rights According to two recent surveys, college students are very uninformed about the religious freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. |
Reason
May 2005
Jacob Sullum |
Injustice is Blind Concluding that federal sentencing guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury because they required sentences to be lengthened based on facts determined by judges, the Supreme Court made the guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. |
Salon.com
December 14, 2000
Gary Kamiya |
Supreme Court to democracy: Drop dead With a single rash, partisan act, the high court has tainted the Bush presidency, besmirched its own reputation and soiled our nation's proudest legacy... |
IDB America
August 2003
Paul Constance |
One-stop justice In Peru, unconventional courthouses make it easy for citizens in marginal areas to take their problems to a judge. |
BusinessWeek
November 18, 2010
Greg Stohr |
Wal-Mart vs. a Million Angry Women Wal-Mart wants the Supreme Court to block a huge gender-bias suit. |
